On Tuesday, after my review of my review, I was talked to in regard to my book resubmission. It is my strong belief that we should not have to resubmit the book as we were responding to our teachers comments when we submitted the work that we did at the end of last semester. His expectation was that we should provide an extensive context and dialogue of our research and findings during the first semester however when everyone in the class talked of doing a much more interesting document he seemed in agreement. However at the time of grading he was insubordinate to our discussions and gave the majority relatively low marks. In fact I got my lowest mark of my entire university carer.
After stating my point of view I was dissuaded from this plan and convinced that submitting a simple soft copy of an updated version of my original book would be acceptable. The updates requested are inclusion of contact profiles, statement of case and reasoning where needed and background on other elements of the project. Specifically there was a comment during this discussion that my presentations during the first semester reflected more work than my book so my intention is to include some of those ideas in the revision.
The submission will be next Tuesday.
2 comments:
hmmm, i also did not want to resubmit. Mainly because i made 6 books. While they were not particulaly appreciated and i was annoyed.....i do have new material/content.
However, this content has come from having time to reflect upon the project though the semester's break.
Anyway,next tuesday i'll show you mine, if you show me yours.
Yeah I really did not want to. I think he should have been more responsible. If he had made it clear that we should have done something else then I would have.
Anyway. I am just going to add some points to mine. I think you should not do to much. I mean just add another bit of text as another book and do not change the first 6 ones.
Post a Comment